posted on 2021-05-22, 10:44authored byPaulina M. Rousseau
Due to its general distrust of the mainstream counterpart, the Feminist Movement has a long
history of creating media products in order to educate, mobilize, and coordinate its actions. The
Feminist Media Products (FMPs) continue to exist and thrive in the digital age. This paper
examines how FMPs fit into existing models of alternative media framed within Atkinson’s three
definitions of alternative media, (2011) and Lievrouw’s Genre Framework for alternative and
activist media (2011), and showcases how online platforms function as participatory spaces for
their users, as outlined by Jensen et al. (2006). A content analysis of 50 FMPs found that FMPs
fit into models of alternative media, with some variations. In the case of Atkinson who states the
content is what makes media alternative, the findings argue that it is rather the perspective with
which the content is presented that makes it alternative. In the case of Lievrouw, the findings
show that FMPs are far more permanent rather than ephemeral. It was also found that online
platforms have allowed for the creation of participatory spaces, and that the founders of FMPs
prioritize this as a goal.