<p><strong>Background:</strong> <em>The Conversation</em> Canada, a platform blending “journalistic flair” with “academic rigour,” often sees its articles republished by major news outlets. However, it does not meet government definitions of a journalistic organization, and only half of surveyed contributing academics consider their work journalism.</p>
<p><strong>Analysis:</strong> Using <em>The Conversation</em> Canada as a case study, this research explores the challenges of defining journalism, who controls these definitions, and the consequences of exclusion, such as ineligibility for government funding and restricted public discourse.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusions and implications:</strong> Rigid journalism definitions risk excluding hybrid platforms like <em>The Conversation</em> Canada, limiting innovation and diverse voices in public discourse.</p>