Megill’s multiverse meta-argument

<p>In a <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/41474805?seq=1" target="_blank"><u>recent paper in this journal</u></a>, Jason Megill (2011) offers an innovative meta-argument which deploys considerations about multiple universes in an effort to block all arguments from evil. In what follows, I contend that Megill has failed to establish a key premise in his metaargument. I also offer a rival account of the effect of multiverse models on the debate about evil.</p>