Librarians rely on the Institute for Scientific Information’s journal impact factor as a tool
for selecting periodicals, primarily in scientific disciplines. A current trend is to use this data as a
means for evaluating the performance of departments, institutions, and even researchers in
academic institutions—a process that is now being tied to tenure and promotion—despite the fact
that such usage can be misleading and prejudicial. This paper will highlight the history of the
development of impact factors, describe the limitations in their use, and provide a critique of the
usage of impact factors in academic settings.