Examining the association between stress and antiretroviral therapy adherence among women living with HIV in Toronto, Ontario

Benoit, Anita C.; Burchell, Ann N.; O'Brien, Kelly K.; Raboud, Janet; Gardner, Sandra; Light, Lucia; Beaver, Kerrigan; Cotnam, Jasmine; Conway, Tracey; Price, Colleen; Rourke, Sean B.; Rueda, Sergio; Hart, Trevor; Loutfy, Mona; The OHTN Cohort Study Research Team,

doi:10.32920/25360171.v1

Examining the association between stress and antiretroviral therapy adherence among women living with HIV in Toronto, Ontario

journal contribution

posted on 2024-03-07, 16:08 authored by Anita C. Benoit, Ann N. Burchell, Kelly K. O'Brien, Janet Raboud, Sandra Gardner, Lucia Light, Kerrigan Beaver, Jasmine Cotnam, Tracey Conway, Colleen Price, Sean B. Rourke, Sergio Rueda, Trevor HartTrevor Hart, Mona Loutfy, The OHTN Cohort Study Research Team

Background

We aimed to identify the association between stress and antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence among women in HIV care in Toronto, Ontario participating in the Ontario HIV Treatment Network Cohort Study (OCS) between 2007 and 2012.

Materials and methods

We conducted cross-sectional analyses with women on ART completing the AIDS Clinical Trial Group (ACTG) Adherence Questionnaire. Data closest to, or at the last completed interview, were collected from medical charts, through record linkage with Public Health Ontario Laboratories, and from a standardized self-reported questionnaire comprised of socio-demographic and psycho-socio-behavioral measures (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)), and stress measures (National Population Health Survey). Logistic regression was used to quantify associations with optimal adherence (≥95% adherence defined as missing ≤ one dose of ART in the past 4 weeks).

Results

Among 307 women, 65.5% had optimal adherence. Women with suboptimal compared to optimal adherence had higher median total stress scores (6.0 [interquartile range (IQR): 3.0–8.1] vs. 4.1 [IQR: 2.0–7.1], p = 0.001), CES-D scores (16 [IQR: 6–28] vs. 12 [IQR: 3–22], p = 0.008) and reports of hazardous and harmful alcohol use (31.1% vs. 17.9%, p = 0.008). In our multivariable model, we found an increased likelihood of optimal adherence with the absence of hazardous and harmful alcohol use (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR)=2.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12–4.32) and a decreased likelihood of optimal adherence with more self-reported stress (AOR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.33–0.94).

Conclusions

Interventions supporting optimal ART adherence should address stress and include strategies to reduce or eliminate hazardous and harmful alcohol use for women living with HIV.